LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE
  • About Us
    • Who We Are >
      • Corporate Members
      • Law Firm Members
      • Defense Bar Organization Members
      • Board of Directors
      • Staff
    • LCJ Civil Justice Fellows Program
    • LCJ Annual Report
    • JOIN LCJ
    • Contact LCJ
  • Our Initiatives
    • Fix and Follow Federal Rule of Evidence 702
    • MODERNIZE PRIVILEGE LOG REQUIREMENTS
    • Protect the Right to Seal Proprietary and Confidential Information
    • Rules for MDLs
    • Disclose Third Party Litigation Funding
    • "Requester Pays" Discovery
    • Preserve Judicial Independence
    • Amend Rule 23(b)(3)
  • Amicus Briefs
  • LCJ In the News
  • Membership Meetings & Resources
    • LCJ May 2023 Meeting
    • December 2022 meeting and photo gallery
    • LCJ CALENDAR
    • Member Login
    • MEMBERSHIP MEETINGS

PROTECTING THE RIGHT TO SEAL PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTAIL INFORMATION  

LCJ is working to protect litigants’ ability to file documents under seal by advocating against a proposal currently before the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules that would create an expansive new role for federal courts to serve as a clearinghouse for accessing private information. 

The proposal is authored by Eugene Volokh, a professor at the UCLA School of Law, and supported by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. It would: 
  • Establish a presumption of public access
  • Impose an onerous four-part test for sealing
  • Require courts to make "particularized findings" to justify sealing
  • Allow members of the public to challenge sealing orders "at any time"
  • Automatically terminate all sealing order 60 days after disposition of the case
 
There is a comprehensive and effective legal framework already in place to govern the sealing of documents, including Rule 5.2, district court local rules, and an extensive body of caselaw.  There is no reason for the Committee to re-visit this complicated issue.  But, if the Committee undertakes to draft a new national standard, it should set aside the unworkable proposal and instead fashion a rule that provides pragmatic guidance for courts and parties balancing the legitimate need for litigants to seal proprietary information with the public interest in oversight of the judicial process.  Any new rule should:
  • ​(i) Clearly distinguish between discovery and court-filed documents;
  • (ii) Allow parties to stipulate to protection of discovery information;
  • (iii) Apply the presumption of public disclosure only to documents that are important to the determination of case merits;
  • (iv) Provide a mechanism to ensure information exchanged during discovery is appropriately protected from cybersecurity threats; and 
  • (v) Establish a procedure for parties and courts to minimize the amount of potentially confidential information that gets filed with courts in the first place.
 
Here are some important materials:
  • Comment to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules: "Sealing Fate: The Proposal to Restrict Judicial Discretion Over Sealing Confidential Information Would Impose Unworkable Standards on the Courts, Conflict with Statutory Privacy Rights, and Stoke Unprecedented Satellite Litigation." - March 24, 2021
  • ​Professor Volokh's Report on Sealing and Unsealing of Documents - August 2020​​
 Copyright Lawyers For Civil Justice.  All Rights Reserved.
LCJ is a non-profit 501(c)(6) trade association and does not employ any attorneys for hire.  
1530 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1030 | Arlington, Virginia, US 22209
Phone:
 202-429-0045 | contact | sitemap
Picture
  • About Us
    • Who We Are >
      • Corporate Members
      • Law Firm Members
      • Defense Bar Organization Members
      • Board of Directors
      • Staff
    • LCJ Civil Justice Fellows Program
    • LCJ Annual Report
    • JOIN LCJ
    • Contact LCJ
  • Our Initiatives
    • Fix and Follow Federal Rule of Evidence 702
    • MODERNIZE PRIVILEGE LOG REQUIREMENTS
    • Protect the Right to Seal Proprietary and Confidential Information
    • Rules for MDLs
    • Disclose Third Party Litigation Funding
    • "Requester Pays" Discovery
    • Preserve Judicial Independence
    • Amend Rule 23(b)(3)
  • Amicus Briefs
  • LCJ In the News
  • Membership Meetings & Resources
    • LCJ May 2023 Meeting
    • December 2022 meeting and photo gallery
    • LCJ CALENDAR
    • Member Login
    • MEMBERSHIP MEETINGS